|JAHG-USA Web Site||Subscribe to our newsletter Home|
Bi-Weekly Newsletter of Judaic Theocracy
Week of 24 Sivan, 5767 / June 10, 2007
Editor: Boruch (Bryan) Ellison
"Issues of World War III" Survey
"Should women be elected to top positions in government?" Our current readership covers a relatively wide religious spectrum including Jews (Hasidic and other orthodox, as well as non-observant), Hasidic Gentiles, and Christians (Protestant, and possibly Catholic as well) and resides all over the world, not just the United States. Yet, to our surprise, this diversity didn't prevent readers from answering this week's question with a unanimous "No." Evidently feminist concepts don't sell well among conservatives anywhere, and conservative values are probably the one common denominator uniting most of our readers. Here are excerpts of additional comments:
Even a quick, international survey of women who are recent political leaders or candidates seems, at first glance, to give a clue. There's the avidly pro-Communist Condoleezza Rice, long-time, prominent member of the Fabian Socialist Council on Foreign Relations (CFR); Hillary Clinton, whose husband is a CFR member, and who has her own long history of participation in Communist and terrorist organizations; Angela Merkel, chancellor of Germany, whose father and she herself have evidently been agents of East German intelligence (the Stasi), and therefore of the Soviet KGB/SVR; Segolene Royal of France, recent candidate of its Communist-affiliated Socialist Party; Michelle Bachelet, the Communist underground revolutionary now president of Chile; Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Fabian Socialist occupying the presidency of Liberia; Tzippy Livni, a former member of the Communist-infiltrated Mossad (Israeli intelligence) and a brazen advocate of surrender to the PLO who potentially stands next in line for Israeli prime minister; and many others.
But plenty of Communist or Socialist men are equally available, so the preponderance of hard Leftists among female politicians hardly explains the Leftist enthusiasm specifically for women as leaders.
Nor does it explain the nearly universal Communist policy of promoting women to leadership positions within their own Communist parties, regimes, or other organizations. Terrorist groups ranging from the PLO to the Sendero Luminoso (Shining Path) of Peru to the Weather Underground of the U.S. actively promote women up their ranks; so do Communist regimes, not just in Soviet republics or Red China, but even in the conservative Muslim world as in Communist Algeria and Communist Iran, where large numbers of women are placed in leading positions in government and other institutions. And that's not just Communist practice; Communist "ideology" explicitly states that women must be promoted within any Communist apparatus in order for the revolution to achieve its true goals.
But what goals could those be? Communism is only interested in social demolition, anarchy, and the end of world civilization. What role does the political promotion of women play in revolutionary destruction?
One can get some idea of the direction Communists wish to take the world by examining pagan, especially ancient, societies. Even a glancing overview quickly draws one's attention to the extreme proliferation in idolatrous cultures of female deities (goddesses), female priestesses and oracles, female rulers, and female participation in pagan festivals (especially in mass prostitution). Those societies were permeated with licentiousness and the moral weakness typical of paganism.
In the workplace and elsewhere, when men lead and women are not present, a culture of achievement and effectiveness can more easily take root. But when the numbers and/or status of women predominate, men become distracted and ineffective, light-headed socializing overpowers hard work, and immorality takes over while goal-oriented thinking is neglected.
That's precisely the kind of havoc Communists aim to wreak in all political and social institutions throughout the world, eventually reducing all society to the level of animalistic savages in the wild.
Relevant Torah Principles:
1) Torah Law prohibits Jewish women from ever serving as priests in the Temple, from being judges (and thus from being rabbis, who serve as judges), from ruling as monarch (only kings, not queens, may rule), and generally from holding any position of leadership over men, largely for the sake of modesty and avoiding licentiousness.
2) Noahide Law likewise prohibits gentile women from serving as judges (see Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Laws of Kings 9:14). Since a monarch performs some duties as a judge, this would strongly imply gentile nations should also not be ruled by queens, only by kings; by extension, this would apply to presidents and prime ministers, who typically wield powers of law enforcement and issuing pardons.
3) The principles of modesty and avoiding immoral flirtation between the genders definitely applies to gentiles as much as to Jews. This has been confirmed by at least one rabbi that I know of, and in any case falls under the concept of principles that are mandated by logic, which the Lubavitcher Rebbe proved (using various Torah sources) applies to the Noahide Laws. Thus the integration of men and women into common workplaces, or the elevation of women to authority over men, would be forbidden for reasons of modesty.
4) By implication, Jewish sage Maimonides applies the Torah prohibitions against cross-dressing (men in women's clothes, or women in men's clothes) to gentiles under the commandment against idolatry. As Maimonides explains in his Sefer HaMitzvos ("Book of Commandments"), cross-dressing was practiced in pagan societies specifically for its effect in encouraging licentious thoughts and behavior, an essential part of many idolatrous ceremonies and rituals. By extension, women occupying men's roles in any context tends to encourage immorality, as witnessed by the tide of adulterous affairs in business, academic, and political settings today.
5) In an emergency, Torah does allow a woman temporarily to serve in a leadership capacity. The prototypical example is of Deborah, a judge during the early period of the ancient Israeli nation. But the very fact that she had to serve as judge and leader is cause for the rabbinical sages to criticize the Jews of that generation, who lacked any man strong enough to lead. Deborah herself criticized her own husband for his pathetic weakness, thus forcing her to lead instead. As the Talmud explains, in a place where no one else acts as a man, one is commanded to step forward and be a man (see Pirkei Avos 2:5).
The drive to elevate women to political leadership isn't just forbidden, it's a deadly trap designed to tear down society. The enemy seeks to pull our culture down into ineffectiveness, paralysis, and defeat.
Thus as much as we must prevent subversives from becoming leaders, we must even more urgently prevent female subversives from achieving power. And we must all become politically active (men influencing men, and women influencing women separately) to expose and neutralize the feminist movement. It's an obligation not only for Jews, but also for gentiles under the Noahide Law of establishing proper justice (and proper political systems).
And now for this week's survey question:
|In the absence of Bush Administration willingness to win wars, should we support Iranian opposition groups to help them overthrow the Iranian regime?
(1) Yes, give them the resources they need.
If the above links don't work, send your response to firstname.lastname@example.org and manually type in your answer.
Only one answer per e-mail address will be accepted; only e-mail addresses on our subscription list are eligible. Please send your input by Tuesday, June 26th, 2007, 12pm PST.
Interfaith Subversion Update, Part 8 Shlomo Amar
Israel's Chief Sephardic rabbi, Shlomo Amar, is proving he's every bit as subversive as his colleague, Chief Ashkenazic Rabbi Yona Metzger. Together with Metzger, Amar has participated in interfaith meetings strictly forbidden by Torah Law, of course with the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury in England, with Pope Benedict XVI in Italy, and even with the Tibetan Buddhist Dalai Lama in Jerusalem.
But Amar isn't satisfied merely with honoring idolatrous leaders; he takes the time to legitimize terrorists, too.
Last December, Amar had the chutzpah (brazen audacity) to participate in an ecumenical meeting with Michel Sabbah, the Catholic archbishop of Jerusalem and a virulently pro-Communist, pro-PLO radical; Mawfiq Tarif, the pro-PLO religious leader of the pagan Druze sect originally founded by Gnostic revolutionaries; and Sheikh Abdullah Nimar Darwish, founder of the pro-PLO Islamic Movement, a front for the terrorist group Hamas. Naturally, the meeting featured a lavish dose of Communist, anti-Israel propaganda in addition to legitimizing false religions. But Amar didn't even walk out, preferring to drag the name of the Jewish people into that cesspool of propaganda by continuing the "dialogue" with those subversives.
Last month, Amar extended his generosity to Christian missionaries, and Marxist ones at that. He and Yona Metzger both tried to legitimize a pair of conferences in Jerusalem between Leftist evangelical Christian groups (linked to Communist-aligned movements) and Jews, despite a clear ruling by leading rabbis that participation in those conferences was absolutely prohibited by Torah. By throwing the rabbis' ruling into question, Amar helped the missionaries gain legitimacy and access to naive Jews.
Amar even puts his energies into promoting the insidious agenda of the Communist-front, interfaith Root & Branch Association
Some of the "lost tribes" voices, including
Stung by criticism that he was flooding the Jewish people with marginal or illegitimate converts, Amar made squeaking noises last November about taking measures to block phony conversions to Judaism by the anti-Torah Reform and "Conservative" movements (both founded and dominated by Communists, and both rejecting all the fundamentals of Jewish Law and tradition). But given his obvious subversive, anti-Jewish agenda, don't count on Shlomo Amar to carry out those promises anytime soon.
He'll probably be too busy with another interfaith meeting.
To be continued
(Note: The underground Communist apparatus and its aboveground tentacles are actively engaged in subversion in all sectors and institutions of society today. Its agents would dearly love to know the full extent of our information, which would assist their disinformation efforts. Consequently, we do not divulge all our facts or sources. These profiles are intended only as a warning to the wise to monitor the individuals and groups exposed here, and to avoid their influence.)
Eye-Openers in the News
A closer look at news reports in recent weeks turns up some revealing gems:
Summary of PLO-related terror attacks these last two weeks, Wednesday (May 30) through Tuesday (June 10):
Even while the PLO and Hamas continue to share money, weapons, and members, they're still issuing phony reports about "fighting" between the groups, complete with largely unconfirmable casualty stories. The disinformation has two main effects: (1) Palestinian Arab civilians are being randomly injured and murdered, sowing seeds of intimidation among the general Arab population, and (2) the CFR-dominated George Bush Administration has an extra excuse to give the PLO more money and weapons (to fight off Hamas, you understand).
Americans already don't like the aid to the PLO's Communist revolution, and a bit more activism can make the difference in cutting off the PLO's lifeline. Find out how you can participate in JAHG-USA's campaign at our PLO-defunding site, at www.attacreport.com/plo/volunteer.php.
Casualty count for these last two weeks (not counting dead & injured terrorists):
(Sources: various Israeli and American news agencies)
Letters to the Editor
(Part 2 of a letter in response to our May 13th issue):
" [There is] a massive campaign to convert westerners to Islam . What worries me is our government and councils accomodating the wishes of the fundamentalist Muslims . They have anti-Semitic book shops set up in their ghettoes, yet cry out if anyone complains. They run the streets raping and bashing, but it's a 'youth problem.' They even threaten the police and judges . The west is naive to what's in store." JR.
Our response: People in Christian nations don't just hear about "Al Qaeda" and the threat of "fundamentalist Islam" from the television set; in many cases, large immigrant communities of Arabs are breeding grounds of revolutionary propaganda, crime, gangs, and even large-scale violence. Hezbollah crime syndicates in the United States and South America, suicide bombers in England, radical Imams in Germany, and gangs conducting sophisticated urban guerrilla warfare in France have persuaded millions of westerners that they face a growing Islamic menace.
There's a lot of truth in this perception. Terrorist groups and their interlocking front organizations are spreading their tentacles among Muslims, especially Arabs, in western nations. They are moving men, money, and weapons across national borders, most often to support revolution in the Middle East but also to operate against western targets themselves.
There's just one, huge error with how people judge the problem: It isn't coming from Muslims.
As can be readily documented in most cases, the criminal and radical activities in Arab or Muslim communities are entirely run by Marxist-Leninist movements who hate all religion, including Islam. Their networks are built around various Communist parties, coordinated by the Soviet Russian KGB/SVR and its proxy intelligence agencies in the Middle East, supported by local, non-Muslim Communists, and closely linked to Marxist revolutionary forces such as black power, white power, Latino gangs, the Irish Republican Army (IRA), the Basque ETA, and numerous other non-Muslim forces.
The "Islamic" label is purely a diversion for outsiders, a shield to help disguise the Soviet Russian and Red Chinese coordination of the international revolution that is, to allow Moscow and Beijing to conduct terrorism while being protected from retaliation.
The Torah explains that the Amaleki nation of evil is the world's expert at disguising itself behind other nationalities while attacking, precisely to confuse our counter-attack and render it ineffective.
Send your letter to the editor to email@example.com.
Be sure to visit the rest of our Web site, Noahide.com.