|JAHG-USA Web Site||Subscribe to our newsletter Home|
Bi-Weekly Newsletter of Judaic Theocracy
Week of 9 Adar II, 5768 / March 16, 2008
Editor: Boruch (Bryan) Ellison
"Issues of World War III" Survey
"Did Colombia have the right to violate the sovereignty of its neighbor, Ecuador, in its recent invasion across the border?" In a word, all responding readers answered "yes." All comments reflected the same annoyance that Colombia's neighbors are allowing terrorists safe haven on their side of the border.
Still, the issue of national sovereignty needs to be looked at more closely.
In England in the late 1800s, a network of front groups was born as a tentacle of Satanic, revolutionary secret societies. The nucleus of this network had no formal operating name, but was alternatively referred to by its own members as the Milner Group, Milner's Kindergarten, the Round Table Group, the Cliveden set, the Chatham House group, and other names. Among its public branches were the Fabian Society, which advocated Socialism in disguise (its emblem was a wolf in a sheep suit); the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA), the British branch for recruiting prominent and influential leaders; the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the American branch for the same, founded by President Woodrow Wilson's Marxist advisor, Edward Mandell House; and a number of other branches in various English-speaking nations.
In America, the network has expanded into the World Federalist Association, the Foreign Policy Association, the World Affairs Councils, the Trilaterial Commission (an international group), and many others. Through recruitment and infiltration, this Fabian Socialist network has for decades dominated the major philanthropic tax-exempt foundations, the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency, the major news media, and many other circles of influence and power.
Though not synonymous with Communism, the Fabian Socialist network often overlaps with Communist circles, with many individuals belonging to both. The Fabian Socialist web is, for all intents and purposes, a separate tentacle of the Amaleki world revolution, working hand-in-hand for Communist revolution. Its members have played instrumental roles in providing western money and technology to the Communist Bloc (including aid to the PLO); building and promoting the United Nations; sabotaging the American war effort and trying to prevent victory in World War II, the Korean War, Vietnam, the Persian Gulf War, and today's Iraq and Afghanistan wars; disarming the military; and undermining the economy through Socialism.
In a 1953 conversation that was meant to be off the record, Rowan Gaither, president of the Ford Foundation, frankly admitted to a representative of a Congressional investigating committee not only the existence of this network, but even its goal: that it had long been working through its members in high places "to so alter life in the United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union" (interview with Normad Dodd, cited in McIlhany, The Tax-Exempt Foundations, 1980). For perspective, that was the period of Josef Stalin's dictatorship in the Soviet Union.
One of the Fabian Socialist network's biggest agenda items has been what it calls "internationalism," the abolition of national sovereignty in favor of a world government. Given Rowan Gaither's admission and numerous publications by Fabian-network organizations, it is perfectly clear that such a "world government" would be Communist.
As a growing conservatism on the part of the general population makes such subversion more and more difficult, the Fabians have been forced to advocate more piecemeal approaches to internationalism, ones that disguise the goal behind a dizzying array of treaties, laws, and justifications. But the goal of weakening western nations from within, undermining their governments to prepare the way for Socialist revolution from above and Communist revolution from below, remains the same.
So then it might seem puzzling, at first glance, that the Fabian-dominated U.S. State Department cooperated with the process at the Organization of American States, a highly internationalist group, in which Colombia was condemned for violating Ecuador's national sovereignty. The Fabian-dominated news media sided against Colombia, and the Fabian agents of America's State Department quietly allowed Colombia to be pressured into apologizing for its cross-border raid. Why the sudden concern for national sovereignty by internationalists?
The answer lies in the fact that Colombian troops were chasing terrorists of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), the armed wing of the Colombian Communist Party that has murdered untold thousands of civilians and dominates the cocaine industry in the western hemisphere. The FARC is controlled by the secret police of Communist Cuba, and it receives safe haven across the borders in neighboring Venezuela and Ecuador, both led by overt Communists allied with Cuba. So in this case, national sovereignty was the excuse for protecting Communist terrorists, and internationalism went out the window.
That's how it works on every issue. The Fabians advocate protecting the national sovereignty of most Communist-occupied countries, but favor internationalism against American and Western European sovereignty. They favor Mexican sovereignty to prevent American intervention against Communists and Marxists, but oppose Mexican sovereignty when the nation tries to secure its borders against Communist terrorists from Guatemala. They favor sovereignty for a PLO state in Israel, but support sending international peacekeepers to prevent Israel from protecting its own borders. And so on.
The point is that the Amaleki revolution, including its Communist and Fabian wings, does not advocate any particular ideology. Every cause, every "-ism," is merely another slogan to manipulate strategically and tactically for the underlying purpose of Satanic revolution against Judaism and the theocracy of
Relevant Torah Principles:
1) The protection of each nation's independent sovereignty is rooted in the Noahide Laws, under which gentile nations are forbidden to conquer others for imperial purposes (Talmud Bavli, Sanhedrin 59a).
2) National sovereignty is not absolute under Torah Law, however. Upon following certain procedures laid out in
3) Torah prophecy describes the three "wars of Gog and Magog" as world wars, endangering the very existence of many nations and threatening great destruction on a global scale. "King Gog," a prophetic allusion to the hidden forces of Amalek, would pit nations against one another (nationalism) and ultimately unite them together (internationalism) for a war against Israel and the Jewish people. The first two of those wars have already taken place (World Wars I and II). The third world war threatens the survival of all nations and peoples throughout the world, unless they join the side of Israel against the Amaleki enemy. Every nation will participate in that war, on one side or the other. So any nation that does not join
Whether people choose to recognize it or not, the entire world is at war, caught between the polar opposites of Israel and the Jewish people on one hand and the Amaleki conspiracy of Communists, Fabians, and other revolutionaries on the other. There is no longer any issue of protecting any nation's independence; either a nation is fighting the Communists, or it is on their side. Any nation that provides aid and comfort to the enemy must be dealt with by force, if necessary.
At the same time, participation in Fabian Socialist "internationalism," including the United Nations and various international treaty organizations, is another Amaleki trap that pulls nations under increasing Communist control.
We must stand against both traps, demanding leadership that is not distracted by false ideologies of nationalism or internationalism, but which focuses on one goal only: victory over Amalek. And this can only be accomplished under the leadership of the Jewish people,
And now for this week's survey question:
|What is the best way to protect oneself against inflation?
(1) Make investments in stocks that pay high returns or bonds that pay high interest.
If the above links don't work, send your response to firstname.lastname@example.org and manually type in your answer.
Only one answer per e-mail address will be accepted; only e-mail addresses on our subscription list are eligible. Please send your input by Tuesday, April 1st, 2008, 12pm PST.
This week: Rabbi Shear Yashuv Cohen, part 4
Right alongside interfaith subversion of Judaism and advocating surrender to the PLO, the chief rabbi of Haifa, Israel, has been actively assisting ultra-Leftist, anti-Semitic attacks on Jewish traditions. What better position to lend treasonous help to our enemies than from right inside orthodox Jewish ranks?
In our January 20, 2008 issue, we reviewed the attack by "animal-rights" groups such as PETA on Jewish kosher slaughter. PETA, which we mentioned is a front for Marxist, eco-terrorist groups, echoes the line of Communists and of the German Nazi Party in defining kosher slaughter as "inhumane" to animals, using this propaganda to stir up hatred against Jews and traditional Torah practice. We reviewed the PETA attack on the Rubashkin kosher slaughterhouse in Iowa in 2004, a campaign that used out-of-context video footage to incite the emotions of naive people in waging its anti-Semitic, hate-mongering agenda.
What we didn't mention in that article was that one of PETA's biggest advocates in that smear campaign was none other than Rabbi Shear Yashuv Cohen! On the basis of distorted and potentially fraudulent video footage, he publicly sided with PETA, denounced the Rubashkin slaughter methods without even bothering to see them firsthand, deliberately misconstrued Jewish halachah (religious law) to invent new grounds on which to smear the Rubashkin operation, refused to withdraw those public anti-Rubashkin comments, and was caught making self-contradictory statements in his frenetic war against the kosher slaughterhouse.
Those are all classic violations of the Jewish commandments against lashon hara (literally, "evil speech," referring to slanderous statements), and all in service of Marxist anti-Semitism!
But even worse, it turns out that Cohen is a self-described vegetarian, which is forbidden under Jewish Law and which further links him to the radical "animal-rights" movement.
Cohen's position on the kosher-supervision committee of Israel's Chief Rabbinate gives him enormous leverage to pressure kosher slaughterers to conform to "animal-rights" demands a chillul Hashem (desecration of
On top of the subversion of Jewish religious practice, such "animal-rights" rules only drive up the price of meat at a time when the economy is taking a nosedive, making kosher food harder to get for Jews. But that's the point, of course.
By now, it's perfectly obvious that "Rabbi" Cohen is simply another agent of Communism, a mole dug into the ranks of orthodox leadership. That makes his role as a supposed "right-wing" leader all the more disturbing. Indeed, he is a key link between the bogus "Sanhedrin," the interfaith Root and Branch Association, and the sellout of the Israeli opposition.
To be continued
(Note: The underground Communist apparatus and its aboveground tentacles are actively engaged in subversion in all sectors and institutions of society today. Its agents would dearly love to know the full extent of our information, which would assist their disinformation efforts. Consequently, we do not divulge all our facts or sources. These profiles are intended only as a warning to the wise to monitor the individuals and groups exposed here, and to avoid their influence.)
This Week's Update at Hasidic University
The newest update of our sister site, Hasidic University, features 31 new profiles regarding the Noahide Laws:
Summary of PLO-related terror attacks these last two weeks, Wednesday, March 5, through Tuesday, March 18:
The Bush Administration, dominated by the Fabian Socialist Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), is working around the clock to override American sympathy for Israel and instead to assist the Communist PLO revolution. Yet there are still some orthodox rabbis refusing to endorse the PLO-defunding Proclamation. Those rabbis must be confronted and pressured to get on board with their Torah obligations. Help JAHG-USA's PLO-defunding campaign today by visiting our site, www.plo.attacreport.com/volunteer.php.
Casualty count for these last two weeks (not counting dead & injured terrorists):
(Sources: various Israeli and American news agencies)
Letters to the Editor
(In response to the article on "animal rights" in our January 20th issue):
"Whoever wrote the editorial about Kosher laws, animal rights activists being communists, etc., is an uneducated person Kosher law is suppose[d] to prevent animals from suffering during slaugh[t]er. I would think that all Jews keeping Kosher would be trying to meet some of the same goals as those 'communists' (the animal rights groups like PETA). I'm not Jewish but you cheapen the word anti-semite when you use it against groups like PETA in reference to Kosher slaughter. [The Nazi Party's] objections to Kosher killing techniques had nothing to do with their love of animals. It was just a way they found to stir up public hatred towards Jews. Hatred can be stirred up against any group for any reason that can be dreamed up." JM.
Our response: This letter is itself a crystal-clear demonstration that the "animal rights" movement is, indeed, a weapon designed to stir up anti-Semitism.
A normal person would be horrified at the genocidal slaughter of hundreds of millions of human beings by the Communists (see our Genocide Clock on ATTAC Report). But the artificial "animal-rights" ideology, concocted by Marxist revolutionaries who don't believe in it themselves, so twists the minds of its duped followers that they begin to think of Communists as allies against Jews and other people who don't treat animals according to the contrived standards of PETA. Witness the above correspondent who wants "to meet some of the same goals as those 'communists'." That person is too blinded by propaganda of 'animal holocausts' to see any threat in murderous Communism, and is already drifting into the camp of outright Marxist hate-mongering and revolution. The trap is closing.
Note that Jewish Law has been twisted and misinterpreted in the above letter to set the stage for hatred of Jews. Contrary to the letter-writer, kosher slaughter was not meant to reduce animal suffering. It so happens that kosher slaughter tends to be more humane than most other forms of slaughter, but that was never its purpose. Whether kosher slaughter causes less or more suffering to animals, the point is to render the meat spiritually pure. And that doesn't depend in the least on the animal's suffering or lack thereof. But by redefining the alleged 'purpose' of Jewish Law, the "animal-rights" radicals begin building resentment of Jewish traditions on purely concocted grounds.
The letter-writer is quite correct in noting that the German Nazi Party invented "animal-rights" ideologies to justify aspects of its Socialist revolution, including anti-Semitism. Truly, "hatred can be stirred up against any group for any reason that can be dreamed up." That's a precise description of "animal rights," yet another mind-warping, propagandistic weapon in the Communist arsenal of psychological warfare.
Once "animal-rights" radicals decide to firebomb Jewish slaughterhouses or synagogues in retaliation for kosher slaughtering methods, which side do you suppose the above letter-writer will sympathize with more? Which side will that person take if the government tries to shut down Jewish kosher slaughter, thus making kosher meat unavailable to Jews?
Send your letter to the editor to email@example.com.
Be sure to visit the rest of our Web site, Noahide.com.