|JAHG-USA Web Site||Subscribe to our newsletter Home|
Bi-Weekly Newsletter of Judaic Theocracy
Week of 11 Iyar, 5767 / April 29, 2007
Editor: Boruch (Bryan) Ellison
"Issues of World War III" Survey
"Is it time for U.S. forces to withdraw from Iraq, or should they stay and fight on?" None of the responding readers favored supporting President Bush in continuing the fight in Iraq. But the opinions were split evenly between withdrawing immediately and "other" specifically, to change the war policy in Iraq to allow for rapid and total victory. Here are some excerpted comments:
The Communist Bloc cannot hope to defeat the rest of the world through straightforward conquest; they haven't a fraction of the military strength needed. So they must lure target countries, especially strong ones, into traps and ambushes that gradually drain the economic, political, social, and psychological strength of their populations.
This strategy is known as the "quagmire conflict," or the "no-win war." Its success depends on having (a) a battlefield in which the Communists may conduct sporadic or guerrilla warfare from safe havens, (b) some excuse to limit the use of our full firepower, and (c) a "fifth column" of spies and allies leading our government and armed forces, traitors who will find every excuse to block our side from victory while the attack-and-retreat fighting drags on endlessly, gradually weakening our morale. The object is to create a defeatist attitude on our side, so that we won't be willing to muster the strength to fight again.
America has not been the only target of quagmire warfare, but it has been the most prominent. Over and over again, the Communists have tried to draw the United States into no-win wars, often succeeding at least in part. In Korea in the 1950s, Soviet generals were able to direct the North Korean Communist forces from a distance, and Red Chinese armies were free to attack from their protected sanctuary in China; President Truman, meanwhile, prevented American forces from fighting back with full strength, and the troops operated under the command of a Soviet general at the United Nations. That's why the U.S. never won an otherwise easy victory.
The same happened in Vietnam, only worse. The Vietnam War could easily have been won in a matter of weeks, but U.S. forces weren't allowed to invade North Vietnam, nor to cut off the supply lines to the Viet Cong guerrillas in the south, nor even to hold territory in South Vietnam and isolate the terrorists. Often American soldiers couldn't even carry loaded guns, and were required to surrender territory back to the enemy almost as soon as it was won in hard battle. Vietnam was another defeat snatched from the jaws of an easy victory.
Even as America was withdrawing from Vietnam in 1972, leading Communists were already formulating plans for another quagmire conflict for the U.S., this time in the Middle East. At that time, George Habash, the Christian Arab-turned-Communist who founded the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP, a PLO member organization), publicly declared the aim of drawing America into "another Vietnam throughout the Arab world." This, he said, was part of the larger Communist objective of defeating the U.S. and paving the way for the destruction of Israel and all other non-Communist nations.
The Communists and their Fabian Socialist allies in the White House tried to implement exactly this Soviet/PLO plan in 1991 with the Persian Gulf War. But despite the best attempts to lose by President Bush, Colin Powell, and James Baker all members of the subversive Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) General Schwarzkopf unexpectedly began winning the war quickly. His leash was yanked and the troops were stopped before they could finish the job.
The elder Bush, Clinton, and younger Bush Administrations made several more attempts to find that "sweet spot," the balance between inducing Americans to want to fight while making sure they didn't want to win too badly. Somalia, Yugoslavia (Bosnia and Kosovo), Afghanistan every time, Americans either didn't want to start fighting, or didn't want to stop short of victory.
The Iraq War in 2003 was sabotaged worse than any before. The Bush Administration led American troops into a well-armed, Soviet Russian-directed trap with just a tiny fraction of the military strength needed, without proper air support, hobbled by a strategy aimed at bogging the troops down in urban guerrilla warfare. Again something went wrong; a small number of soldiers surprised everyone with daring raids into Baghdad, triggering a panicked disintegration by the Communist-run Iraqi armies and a miraculous victory. This time it was too late for Bush to save Soviet puppet Saddam Hussein.
But in the aftermath of that victory, the Bush Administration finally managed to create George Habash's quagmire scenario. American troops were forbidden to annihilate the Communist ruling structure of the Baath Socialist Party, and were even forced to cooperate in placing Baathists back in the Iraqi government while handing control of cities back to Baathist Republican Guards. The old Baathist flag was resurrected, and is once again the Iraqi flag. And now military commanders are complaining that the "new" Iraqi police and military forces are badly infiltrated by Baathist spies, rendering them worthless.
American troops are now forced to retreat after every victory, handing control of cities and regions back to the Communist terrorists. When they do fight, they aren't allowed to use serious armored or air power. And they are operating under the most sabotaging "rules of engagement" ever, leaving them sitting ducks for enemy assassination.
The result is two untenable options. The CFR-dominated Bush Administration supports continued fighting without any option of victory, while other CFR leaders notably James Baker, Henry Kissinger, and Madeleine Albright advocate U.S. withdrawal in a way that will enable the Communist Baathist network to seize power and reinstitute the former regime, sucking Iraq right back under Soviet Russian control. Whichever side of the debate prevails, the American and Iraqi people lose. Rapid and devastating victory is the one option not allowed on the table.
Relevant Torah Principles:
1) The mystical teachings of Torah, known as Hasidus, explain that the Amaleki enemy uses three primary strategies in its satanic revolution against
2) Both mystical and more open aspects of Torah also explain that the Amaleki employ such tactics as disguise, traps and ambushes, and other weapons of psychological warfare. The aim is to disrupt the will to fight, rather than the physical ability. This means that even when we are caught in an Amaleki trap of "no-win war," we still retain the ability to win quickly and decisively. But we must overcome our internal, spiritual barriers in order to break free of the trap and achieve victory.
3) The Mishnah, the core of the Talmud, also mentions that the ultimate, Messianic victory over evil will come through determined enthusiasm (Sotah 9:15), the very opposite of comfort and ease (which lead to surrender). Thus victory, and even survival, depend on aggressively moving against the Amaleki enemy and its traps. This means zero tolerance for lack of immediate victory.
4) Treason, defined as giving aid and comfort to the enemy (including sabotaging our victory), is a direct violation of the Noahide commandment of establishing justice. The punishment is death penalty, by beheading. This would apply to anyone, including any political leader, right up to the president himself.
The Torah forbids choosing either option presented in today's political context: withdrawal and defeat, as proffered mainly by the Democrats, or protracted fighting and defeat, as advocated mainly by the Republicans. Both positions are outright treason, and anyone who leads the push for either "choice" must be investigated, removed from office, and prosecuted with capital punishment.
Indeed, victory is impossible without first clearing house, especially the White House. All Communist and Fabian Socialist agents, and their collaborators, must be impeached and removed from authority. Only under a new, genuinely anti-Communist leadership can America hope to win in Iraq, a victory that remains easily within our reach. But we dare not fail.
And now for this week's survey question:
|What's your opinion of yoga? Is it a good form of exercise?
(1) It's evil and shouldn't be used.
If the above links don't work, send your response to email@example.com and manually type in your answer.
Only one answer per e-mail address will be accepted; only e-mail addresses on our subscription list are eligible. Please send your input by Tuesday, May 15th, 2007, 12pm PST.
Interfaith Subversion Update, Part 5 WCRP Invades Israel
In its global drive to merge all religions under Soviet KGB control, the World Conference of Religions for Peace (WCRP) receives financial assistance from some of the biggest names in the revolution-funding business.
Among the tax-exempt foundations donating to WCRP are the Ford Foundation (which also finances PLO operations in Israel), the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. All three are tightly controlled by the Fabian Socialist network of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and all three have been active for nearly a century in funding a cornucopia of Communist and radical movements. The Communist Party USA, black-power revolutionaries, environmentalism, feminism, the anti-victory Vietnam War protest movement, and many other Leftist movements virtually owe their existence to these and similar CFR-dominated foundations. And now the movement for interfaith subversion joins the list.
The WCRP also receives substantial money from the Soviet-controlled United Nations (UN), particularly through its UNICEF, UNESCO, and UNDF agencies. And, no doubt to the surprise of many American taxpayers, from the U.S. government through the official foreign aid programs of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). In other words, President Bush is spending your money to put your religion under Communist control!
Judaism is, of course, the ultimate target of ecumenical subversion. Accordingly, the WCRP works closely with an interfaith network known as the Interreligious Coordinating Council in Israel (ICCI), "an umbrella organization of over 70 Jewish, Muslim and Christian institutions" working to unite all three religions inside Israel into a joint interfaith, activist (read: Marxist and pro-PLO) agenda.
The WCRP has existed since 1970, the ICCI since 1991. Together, the two organizations founded the Kedem project in 2003, which "brings together local leaders of Israelís Jewish, Christian and Muslim communities over an extended period of time to foster dialogue and collaboration around joint action projects" (so says a WCRP press release). At first, Kedem received its primary funding from the German government, but then in 2005 the U.S. stepped in with a foreign aid grant, via USAID, to sponsor the Kedem subversion of religion and Israeli national security. While Kedem leaders remain a bit cagey about their specific goals, they do clearly hint at pushing for Israeli surrender to the PLO through grass-roots work among local religious leaders.
So when you hear various Israeli rabbis, priests, ministers, or sheikhs voice support for the PLO cause or for Israeli abandonment of strategic land, you'll know where it's coming from.
Most rabbis in Israel are orthodox. So with Kedem operating quietly in the background, it's not unexpected that we're seeing some "orthodox" leaders joining the interfaith drive in recent times.
To be continued
(Note: The underground Communist apparatus and its aboveground tentacles are actively engaged in subversion in all sectors and institutions of society today. Its agents would dearly love to know the full extent of our information, which would assist their disinformation efforts. Consequently, we do not divulge all our facts or sources. These profiles are intended only as a warning to the wise to monitor the individuals and groups exposed here, and to avoid their influence.)
Eye-Openers in the News
A closer look at news reports in recent weeks turns up some revealing gems:
Summary of PLO-related terror attacks these last two weeks, Wednesday (April 18) through Tuesday (May 1):
As usual, the PLO and its allied gangs made sure to kill at least one Arab boy and injure two other palestinian Arabs during "gun battles" involving mostly indiscriminate shooting. But in order to unleash the full, planned genocide against the Arabs of the Gaza Strip, the PLO needs to chase away foreign observers. They can't hope to maintain their international funding while carrying out a bloodbath in plain view.
Recent kidnappings of news reporters seem to be doing the trick. Outside news agencies are pulling their journalists and cameramen out of Gaza, and are now relying almost entirely on local palestinian reporters as sources in other words, PLO agents. Bombings and kidnappings against foreign-run schools in Gaza have likewise chased away foreign schoolteachers, leaving the schools in the hands of PLO minions. The day is approaching when the PLO will be able to exterminate Arabs by the tens of thousands without witnessses, when news of the slaughter could take a long time to filter to the outside world while PLO officials issue denials and stall for time.
Meanwhile, the PLO is working alongside the news media, including Israeli news organizations and even such phony "right wing" outlets as the badly infiltrated Arutz-Sheva, to disguise its own role in the terrorism. The media gladly broadcasts PLO rumors that the attacks are coming from "Al Qaeda" or from Hamas. Arutz-Sheva news, while posing as being patriotic to Israel, refers to PLO members merely as "Arab terrorists" and to the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC) as being "Hamas-controlled" even though the PRC was formed and continues to be controlled mainly by two PLO factions, Fatah and the PFLP (with some Hamas members involved). Why the big effort to protect the PLO? Because the PLO is the one receiving American funding (as well as being in control of all anti-Israel terrorism).
Don't wait for bogus Israeli "right wing" leaders to lead the way in cutting off the PLO's gravy train. Take the initiative and visit our PLO-defunding site, at www.attacreport.com/plo/volunteer.php, to volunteer your time in JAHG-USA's campaign.
Casualty count for these last two weeks (not counting dead & injured terrorists):
(Sources: various Israeli and American news agencies)
Send your letter to the editor to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Be sure to visit the rest of our Web site, Noahide.com.